Home › Bonita › Bonita
War of words between current, former Lee sheriffs online
STORY TOOLS
RELATED STORIES
- Verbal duel between GOP candidates for Lee Sheriff
- FDLE finds complaint against Lee sheriff without merit
- Third candidate joins Lee County sheriff race
- Shoap says most growhouses busted sprang up under current Lee Sheriff
- Former Lee Sheriff Rod Shoap running for his old job
- Shoap says he may run for Lee sheriff in 2008
Related Links
More Bonita
- Bonita man seriously injured in I-75 crash
- Today's traffic enforcement locations in Collier, Lee
- Southbound lanes on I-75 closed by accident near marker 131
Share and Enjoy [?]
The Lee County Sheriff’s Office is hip to these high-tech times.
In addition to its official Web site, countless gadgets of varying expense, plus at least one unauthorized, underground Internet message board, the agency now has its very own entry on Wikipedia.
It’s not alone: At least 12 of Florida’s 67 sheriff’s offices have dedicated pages on the Web’s enormously popular user-generated encyclopedia. Collier County isn’t listed, but Hillsborough County has a lengthy entry detailing the agency’s history, structure and roster of sheriffs going back to the 19th century.
Indeed, it’s a lot like most of the Sunshine State sheriff entries.
Except Lee County.
You knew sparks would fly during this summer’s race for Lee sheriff — now it seems the war has taken to the Web.
Witness the Wikipedia entry.
As of Friday, right beneath a mini-biography of Sheriff Mike Scott ran a list of the agency’s “Notable Achievements.” Dating back only as far as 2005 when, incidentally, Scott took over. If you compared that list with one Scott keeps on his own campaign Web site, you’d find chunks of them match nearly verbatim.
So which of the recent, agency-wide achievements are so notable that they should be shared with Wikipedia readers from Des Moines to Jakarta? “Restructured false alarm fees,” one item boasts. “Recalled ‘honorary’ wallet badges from non law enforcement recipients.”
If you work for the agency, you probably know what those things mean. Scott sure does — he has them tacked onto his list at the campaign Web site.
Indeed, of the 22 items on Scott’s list, at least 17 also appear under the “Lee County (Florida) Sheriff’s Office” entry on Wikipedia. With a few words switched around.
To be clear, the sheriff said Thursday he had nothing to do with the agency’s Wikipedia entry. He said he’d never even seen it.
But Scott’s not exactly sitting out of the brewing campaign Web wars.
In a section of his candidacy site titled “A Very Sad Story,” Scott posted roughly four-year-old newspaper clips with headlines needling his opponent, former Lee sheriff Rod Shoap. “Shoap requests record budget,” one reads. “Shoap’s ties to aide questioned.”
That last one brings up a particularly sore point.
Shoap has cited those old allegations of an extra-marital affair with his assistant as a reason he was loathe to put his family through a race to reclaim his old job. And he cited them Thursday as justification for the swipes he takes against Scott on his own campaign site.
Under the “Q & A” section, Shoap asks himself: “Have you ever smoked marijuana or used any other illegal drugs?” No, Shoap answers. But funny you should ask! Turns out, “my opponent, Mike Scott, has used illegal drugs.” Underlined for emphasis.
Shoap explains that Scott wrote on his original application for employment — which is public record — that he tried marijuana once, apparently in about 1983. See it for yourself; Shoap posted the application right there on his campaign page.
“But his attack is OK?” Shoap said in an interview, referring to the allegation of an affair. “Yes, I’m going to come out swinging because people need to know the real him.”
All of this might be expected in what amounts to dueling campaign literature. But how does a local race for sheriff seep into the universal sphere of Wikipedia?
In some ways, the answer is simple. Loyal viewers of Stephen Colbert’s show on Comedy Central know that anyone can type anything into a Wikipedia page (the comedian once took to a keypad on-air and reportedly wrote under his own entry that “Oregon is Idaho’s Portugal.”)
And to Scott, who said he barely knew what Wikipedia was before a reporter brought it up, the free-for-all nature of the Web-based encyclopedia begs the question: Who cares what it says?
Bonita Springs-based historian Charlie Strader said he hasn’t yet posted to the city’s Wikipedia entry. But as a powerful and widely used tool for first-reference on millions of subjects, he said, “Wikipedia will be one to stand the test of time.”
A glance at the history of the Lee County Sheriff’s Office entry shows that it began benignly enough one January evening by user “Shee0077.”
That would be, it turns out, agency spokesman John Sheehan. The version he typed up matched information on the agency’s official Web site and dovetailed with the more formal, academic entries for Hillsborough and others — history, structure, ranks.
Then user “Squat1” set to work, adding Scott’s “notable achievements.”
Contrast that list (which includes under 2007: “Rather than 4.7 percent pay raise across the board, high salaries got less while lower got more”) to Orange County’s entry, in which we learn that one of the Orlando area’s earliest sheriffs was killed in the line of duty, under murky circumstances, in 1870.
Or, under the Jacksonville sheriff’s office entry, a detailed, CSI-friendly breakdown of the detective division (latent print unit, polygraph unit, etc.)
Sheehan said he started the entry knowing how widely used Wikipedia is, particularly by young people, and hoping others with more awareness of the history of Lee’s agency would add to his section.
“Me, personally, I think Wikipedia is interesting because you can find information just on a lot of subjects,” he said. And be it the casual reader or perhaps someone interested in moving to Lee, Sheehan thought, how nice to search for the county’s top law enforcement agency, and stumble upon its rich history.











Demons next door? Your neighbor’s Great Dane took a nap in your flower bed and mistook the front lawn for a loo — and this was on a good day. The music next door may as well be under your bed. You’re wondering why the fruit is disappearing off your trees near someone else’s kitchen window. You have — or have had — neighbors from hell? Tell us about them. We’d like to know what neighbors drove you to the limits, and what — if it was possible with neighbors like that — solved the problem. You don’t need to give us your neighbor’s names, but we do want to hear your experiences for a story on the demons next door, and how to deal with them. Email 


Comments
This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below. Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. Break our rules, and we will ban you. No exceptions, no second chances. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.
“The Constitution was written to restrain the government, never to restrain the people.”
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/pri...
http://findlaw.com/casecode/constitut...
http://www.news-press.com/apps/pbcs.d...
"I think the main issue is the balancing of the individual's rights and their right for privacy vs. using the new technology," Hornung said.
"The courts need to make sure law enforcement doesn't abuse that power because there is a fine line."
#1 Posted by jacktanner on April 21, 2008 at 9:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)
http://www.leap.cc/
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
Current and former members of law enforcement have created a drug-policy reform movement -- LEAP.
We believe that to save lives and lower the rates of disease, crime and addiction. as well as to conserve tax dollars, we must end drug prohibition.
LEAP believes that a system of regulation and control of production and distribution will be far more effective and ethical than one of prohibition.
We do this in hopes that we in Law Enforcement can regain the public's respect and trust, which have been greatly diminished by our involvement in imposing drug prohibition.
#2 Posted by jacktanner on April 21, 2008 at 9:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Legislators, state and federal, cause unintended consequences.
The solution includes electing LEGISLATORS who will vote to REMOVE laws that create unintended consequences.
While other big states find ways to reduce prison population and crime at the same time, Florida continues to stuff its prisons, DESTROY people's lives, and WASTE taxes.
Charlie Green, Lee County Clerk of Court, recognizes the huge cost to taxpayers and loss of personal liberties from unintended consequences of non-violent victim-less crimes including the drug war.
Sheriff budget INCREASED 245% .... 2001- $66,755,000 .... 2007- $163,000,000
http://www.drugpolicy.org/news/incarc...
http://www.miamiherald.com/548/story/...
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v08/n3...
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v08/n4...
http://www.leap.cc/
#3 Posted by jacktanner on April 21, 2008 at 9:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
id guess that you just like to see your BS in print,,,,,, maybe its Me,but i dont see anything that you tried to say,pertinent to this article,,,,,,
#4 Posted by Bullbat on April 22, 2008 at 12:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
jacktanner - It's not "laws that create unintended consequences" that are overloading our penal system, it's "laws that establish mandatory minimum sentences for every crime and take away judicial discretion".
If judges had the ability to work with prosecutors and defense attorneys on plea bargains for sentences that include probation and fines, house arrest, suspended jail time, etc. for first-time and misdemeanor offenders rather than being handcuffed to legislated mandatory minimums, our jails and prisons wouldn't be nearly as crowded as they are.
Politicians need to keep their hands out of the courtrooms and leave that arena to the judges. That's why we have THREE branches of government and not just ONE.
#5 Posted by GatorHater07 on April 22, 2008 at 7:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I agree with Bullbat, what is your point Tanner?
#6 Posted by fishguts on April 22, 2008 at 8:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Your an idiot if you think the "drug war" is non-violent, and victim-less. Go Away.
#7 Posted by pokerbuddy on April 22, 2008 at 10:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Yes... "YOUR" an idiot.
#8 Posted by Smoke_Diver on April 22, 2008 at 12:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Get it right. "YOU'RE" an idiot.
#9 Posted by gutcheck on April 22, 2008 at 2:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Jack just has all the answer, He knows so much about everthing (city gov,fire dept.,sheriff’s office) but he never runs for an council seats.
Maybe he is just full of sh t.
#10 Posted by Blackflag on April 22, 2008 at 7:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
You're right Blackflag, he's full of it and he's the king of cut and paste...
#11 Posted by fishguts on April 22, 2008 at 11:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)