Home › News › Real Estate news
Homes still too high for ’average’ family
RELATED STORIES
More Real Estate news
- Collier Real Estate Transactions: Dec.1, 2008
- Florida lenders halt new foreclosures for 45 days
- Foreclosures down in Lee for November
Tell us about it
- What would you add to this story? Tell us what we missed.
- Do you have photos from this event? Documents we need to see? Share with us.
- Upload photos & videos
- More ways to get your stuff online and in the paper.
STORY TOOLS
Share and Enjoy [?]
One of the worst things about the overall real estate market today is that there doesn’t seem to be any silver lining behind that big black cloud.
Normally, you’d think dramatically falling prices would make homeownership a reality for more moderate-income families.
But even with homes more affordable, the median price is still out of reach for a median-income family in many markets, according to “Paycheck to Paycheck: Wages and the Cost of Housing in America,” a study by the Center for Housing Policy, or CHP, in Washington.
Comparing housing costs in more than 200 metropolitan areas with the wages earned by workers in 60 occupations, the study found that homeownership is unaffordable for all of the five fastest-growing occupations — registered nurses, retail salespeople, customer-service representatives, food-preparation workers and office clerks. Even registered nurses, who typically have high salaries, were unable to purchase a median-priced home in 108 of the markets.
“Even with the housing downturn, the drop in prices still just isn’t enough for many workers in traditional backbone occupations to afford houses,” says Rebecca Cohen, a CHP research associate.
In many parts of the country, the housing increases have outpaced wage growth for almost a decade. Census data released in 2006 revealed that between 2000 and 2005, the burden of housing costs grew sharply.
The CHP study based affordability on the metrics that a family or person should not spend more than 30 percent of household income on rent and utilities while homeowners should not spend more than 28 percent of income on the mortgage, taxes and insurance.
The most recent National Association of Realtors (NAR) report projected a January 2008 median home price of $198,700 and median family income of $59,858. With a 20 percent down payment, a 30-year mortgage at 6.2 percent would mean $973.59 monthly for principal and interest. Assuming $3,600 per year for insurance and property taxes brings the total monthly payment to $1,273.59 — barely within the $1,396 maximum threshold, without factoring in any closing costs.
Lenders have often used formulas such as this to gauge a person’s lending capacity, but property taxes and insurance can vary drastically by region. Cohen says these affordability metrics can also show different stories based on the number of dependents in the house.
“A benchmark is just that and should be taken with a grain of salt. If a single person spends 27 percent of their income on housing, they might be doing great, but if you’re a family with five kids, certainly the amount you’re able to comfortably spend without cutting into your budget will vary,” says Cohen.
Lawrence Yun, chief economist for the NAR, says that in many of the “superstar cities,” such as New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Washington, real estate has always commanded a significant premium. Even with the recent declines in property values, Yun says that when compared to median incomes, housing values in these cities will likely always be out of whack. While the recent declines still haven’t put homes within reach of most residents in these markets, it is a step in favor of buyers.
“Some of those high-profile markets are encountering up to a 10 percent price decline. Certainly, it’s still not affordable, but at least it is better now than it was a year ago,” says Yun.
Between the two coasts in Middle America, Yun says homes are much more affordable when compared with median incomes. There, he says, it is less about interest rates and prices and more about jobs. Yun points to markets such as Dallas, Indianapolis and Milwaukee, where most middle-class residents with good credit and decent jobs can afford median home prices.
Sean Snaith, who holds a Ph.D. in economics and is director of the Institute for Economic Competitiveness at the University of Central Florida, says affordability evaporated in some areas that saw rapid price increases over the past five years. In many parts of the country, home prices have risen to such levels that many middle-class residents have no choice but to move farther outside the city radius and expand their commutes. He points to Washington’s expansion into Virginia and Maryland and Los Angeles’ constant expansion inland as prime examples.
“If you want that single-family home, swing set and the American Dream, the reality is that in major metro areas, most of us will have to commute in order to enjoy that,” says Snaith.
















Comments
This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below. Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. Break our rules, and we will ban you. No exceptions, no second chances. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.
Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)