Home › Opinion & Editorial › Columnists
Brent Batten: Widman’s death leads to change in system
RELATED STORIES
- Grand jury: Fix flawed system that resulted in slaying of Fort Myers officer
- Proposed bill honors fallen Fort Myers officer, hopes to toughen immigration laws
- Brent Batten: Crist aide brings FDLE into investigation
- Brent Batten: Dear governor, please get an answer on what went wrong
- Brent Batten: Officer’s death calls for meeting of minds
- Brent Batten: System failed Widman, community
More Columnists
- Thomas Sowell: Freedom, as understood by the far left, is oppression
- Chad Gillis: Looking to the Web for a sense of community
- Cal Thomas: Mumbai attacks explained simply: West is enabling terrorists
Tell us about it
- What would you add to this story? Tell us what we missed.
- Do you have photos from this event? Documents we need to see? Share with us.
- Upload photos & videos
- More ways to get your stuff online and in the paper.
STORY TOOLS
Share and Enjoy [?]
Who could have read or heard about the death of Fort Myers police officer Andrew Widman and not thought, “Somebody ought to do something.”
Well, somebody is doing something.
Robert Wheeler, assistant general counsel to Gov. Charlie Crist, reports that Lee County will institute a pilot program to prevent tragedies like the murder of Officer Widman from recurring.
That tragedy happened on July 18, when Widman was shot by Abel Arango, a convicted felon with a warrant out for his arrest.
Arango had been in court on June 16 for his arraignment on drug charges. At the time, he had an active arrest warrant on a probation violation. The warrant stipulated that if found, Arango should be held without bond, but the judge didn’t know about it.
Arango walked out of court a free man, left to shoot Widman in a downtown Fort Myers confrontation. Arango was subsequently killed by other officers.
“Neither the trial court, nor the clerk’s office, nor the prosecutor ran a warrant check for Mr. Arango on the Judicial Information System or the FCIC (Florida Crime Information Center) database that would have revealed Mr. Arango’s outstanding warrant.
“Apparently, warrant checks are not routinely run at time of arraignment,” Wheeler wrote as a result of an inquiry into Widman’s death.
The inquiry was requested by the governor through his chief of staff, Eric Eikenberg.
Wheeler’s Aug. 19 letter says the entities that had a hand in Arango’s last trip through the court system -- court administration, law enforcement, the Department of Corrections and prosecutors -- have met, identified the problem and are moving toward a “systemic” solution.
“The state court administrator has researched the feasibility of routinely running a warrant check at the time of arraignment and providing this information to the judge and the parties.
“To this end, Lee County has contracted with a provider to begin a program that will allow for the background data of those charged to be available at arraignment,” Wheeler says.
“If successful, the governor’s office will encourage all local governments to employ this program and work with the leaders of the Legislature during the upcoming legislative session to implement this program statewide.”
In the days after Widman’s death, court officials pronounced the idea of checking the background data of all defendants at arraignment time-consuming and cost-prohibitive, considering hundreds of arraignments may occur on a given day.
Wheeler’s reference to a “provider” suggests technology may be available to overcome that.
If that turns out not to be the case, some other solution still must be sought.
Perhaps a system can be designed to call extra attention to the relative handful of suspects wanted on “no bond” warrants, those deemed too much a threat to release once captured?
Whatever happens, Wheeler says the governor will remain involved.
“Gov. Crist will continue to take an active role by monitoring the progress and has asked the Florida Department of Law Enforcement to assist in any way it can,” Wheeler concludes.
E-mail Brent Batten at bebatten@naplesnews.com







Comments
This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below. Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. Break our rules, and we will ban you. No exceptions, no second chances. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.
"In the days after Widman’s death, court officials pronounced the idea of checking the background data of all defendants at arraignment time-consuming and cost-prohibitive, considering hundreds of arraignments may occur on a given day."
What Court officials or should I say Political Hack said that? I think the taxpayers should know...
Why not check the Immigration status as well???
#1 Posted by streetrodder on August 23, 2008 at 11:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
streetrodder,,, what you ask,is out of the question, ya see,,first it just isnt ,,Politically Correct,,, and secondly,,,its the LAW,already,so it can be,and is, ignored,,,and last but not least ,,its just to much common sense,,the way it Used to be was the arresting Deputy etc, Always ran them at least thru the local computer,,,, and depending on why it was arrested they Can run them all the way, either state wide or nation wide,,,,,,, btw,,, what street rod do you have ?
#2 Posted by Bullbat on August 24, 2008 at 12:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
How many times do we have to read about new procedures being instituted because a good man lost his life?
Wheeler now will purchase new software and update a well-funded computer system that should of caught this thug, before he murdered.
My thought is that will the new software preclude this debacle, or do we have to update the people running the system?
Either way, it is going to cost money.
#3 Posted by volochine on August 24, 2008 at 1:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)
You mean we need legislation to get the various criminal dept's to run a warrant check on those arrested on crimes that put them before the Court?
They should ALL be doing it automatically now!
Such BS!
#4 Posted by swampparadise on August 24, 2008 at 9:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This guy could have shot Officer Widman even if he didn't have the warrant. I applaude the fact that they are going to start running the checks but it's ashamed they had to wait for a tragedy before it was considered and implemented.
#5 Posted by Analytical_Skeptic on August 24, 2008 at 9:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It seems like a common sense thing for the Judge to have all facts pertaining to each case available to him at the time of their appreance in his court!!!
#6 Posted by floridagrower on August 24, 2008 at 11:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Why only run a FCIC when they should also run an NCIC, a national check? The person may be wanted in another state and may slip through the cracks again.
It's hardly difficult as many cops run checks while sitting at a traffic light.
#7 Posted by mattmaki on August 24, 2008 at 2:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
We have the greatest computer systems in the world. We just don't have the right people to run them.
#8 Posted by volochine on August 25, 2008 at 1:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)