Home › News › Local news
Former Collier School Board members in favor of settlement between district, former superintendent
STORY TOOLS
RELATED STORIES
- State Attorney's Office: No evidence Collier School Board violated Sunshine Law
- Collier school district, former superintendent close to $555,000 settlement
- Baker lawsuit versus School Board headed to trial
- Collier school board working to settle Baker lawsuit, attorney says
Related Links
More Local news
- Local Columbus Day parade draws eclectic crowd
- Lehigh Acres man transported to Lee Memorial by Med Flight after motorcycle crash
- Lake Placid woman dies in car crash
Share and Enjoy [?]
They say they know a good deal when they see one.
Now, seven former Collier County School Board members are urging the current board to see the settlement deal with former Superintendent Ray Baker as a good deal for the district.
The e-mail, sent Monday to the current School Board members and some in the media, encouraged the members to vote for the settlement at their Thursday meeting.
“Putting aside other issues which may be pursued in the future, our concern is for the fiscal well-being of the Collier Country School District. The School Board attorney believes the settlement would not cause the District a significant hardship. If the settlement is not approved by the Board, he estimates the suit which will follow will cost between $2.2 million and $2.8 million,” according to the e-mail. “We urge you to do the responsible thing and vote for the proposed settlement.”
The e-mail is signed by former School Board members Barbara Berry, Albert E. Bruggemeyer, Debbie Cook, Barbara Church, Anne Goodnight, Ronald Webster and Donald York.
Baker and the district have reached a tentative agreement to settle Baker’s lawsuit against the district for $555,000.
Bruggemeyer said he had discussed the issue with another School Board member, whom he declined to identify. Once the two discussed the issue, the letter was drafted and they asked the other former members for support.
“If it goes to trial, they will probably lose it,” Bruggemeyer said. “And it will cost them four or five times what it will cost to settle it. It is the cheaper choice.”
District officials had estimated that the suit would cost between $2.2 million and $2.8 million, according to School Board Attorney Richard Withers.
Baker filed his lawsuit against the district on Aug. 20. The lawsuit alleged that the School Board violated state Sunshine Laws, so its July 31 vote to fire Baker was void.
In his recommendation that Baker be terminated, School Board member Richard Calabrese said Baker violated his contract by failing to perform his duties under Florida law.
Baker’s contract was declared void a week after the Hinshaw & Culbertson report found that the district failed to uniformly award credits to students taking courses paired with Advanced Placement classes.
The report followed a four-month investigation into how credits were given at Collier County high schools. The report looked at high school courses district-wide, addressing course credit issues and questions raised by students and their parents.
The report indicated that some students received different credits for taking the same course and the district added the term “honors” to course titles, although the Florida Department of Education didn’t authorize a course title with that designation.
The district has argued that once Baker failed to perform his duties, he couldn’t use the provisions of his contract to keep his job.
In the suit, Baker contended that School Board Chairwoman Linda Abbott and School Board members Steve Donovan and Calabrese conspired against him by communicating in secret and with each other, in violation of the Florida Government in the Sunshine Law, to declare his contract void before the board voted 3-2 to fire him at its July 31 meeting.
Under the agreement, which the Collier County School Board still must approve, both sides agree that:
-- The district will pay Baker a total of $555,000 in two equal installments, the first of which will occur before the fiscal year ends June 30. The second will be paid between Jan. 1, 2009, and Jan. 31, 2009. The School Board also agrees to cooperate with Baker in the extent that he may wish to defer the payments or portions of the payment to a tax-deferral program.
-- The School Board will reinstate Baker and his wife to its group health coverage until they become eligible for Medicare coverage.
-- The School Board will acknowledge that the Hinshaw & Culbertson report provides the sole factual basis for its action in terminating Baker, and the board waives any claims for damages it may have under state and federal laws as a result of the breach.
-- Both Baker’s suit and the district’s counterclaim will be dismissed.
-- Baker will acknowledge that the evidence to date does not establish that a violation of the Sunshine Law occurred and waives any claims for damages or reinstatement based upon a Sunshine Law violation.
-- Baker will release the School Board and its members from any liability arising out of or under his employment.
-- The Collier County School Board will release Baker from any liability arising out of or under his employment or under any terms or conditions of his contract.
Baker will be responsible for his own attorney fees under the agreement.
Baker had requested that a judge rule that he enjoy all rights and benefits under his contract, including the right to serve as superintendent, until any lawful termination or expiration of his term. Baker’s contract, before the board voided it, was set to expire June 30, 2009.
If the School Board votes against taking the settlement, both sides will return to the mediator and the suit could move to trial.
---
If you go
What: The Collier County School Board will vote on a proposed settlement between the district and former superintendent Ray Baker at its monthly meeting.
When: 3 p.m. Thursday
Where: The Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Administrative Center, 5775 Osceola Trail.







Comments
This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below. Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. Break our rules, and we will ban you. No exceptions, no second chances. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.
Vote in new School Board members!
www.dooley08.com
Please view my platform & resume!
Bill Dooley for School Board
#1 Posted by dooley on May 12, 2008 at 10:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I thought he was the bad guy, why do we have to give him $555,000?
#2 Posted by doodlebug on May 12, 2008 at 10:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
This made me think back to when Linda Abbott first got on the school board. Practically every vote was 4-1 with Ms. Abbott being the dissenting vote. She was supposed to be the breath of fresh air. Jeff Lytle sang her praises. Her supporters wrote letters to the editor and even had some little phrase that trumpeted her as the exception to the rule. I was always wondering how could 4 people possibly be wrong everytime and 1 could always be right. That just didn't make sense. Now, many years later, we can see that it truly never made sense. Her group cranked up the fervor and enough people bought it to place Mr. Donovan and Mr. Calbrese on the board. They systematically seemed to attempt to change the system into a fiefdom for themselves and their special followers. They still have the same small group of cheerleaders but the general public now has a good sense of the consequences of the board majority's disasterous decision making.
The community tried to speak out the night Ray Baker was fired (for something that may not have been fixed yet). The board majority ignored the pleas of the community, parents, teachers and even the advice of counsel. How much longer does this idiocy need to continue?
#3 Posted by beenthere_56 on May 12, 2008 at 11:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Bill Dooley of Naples was noodling around the Internet. As a substitute teacher, he was intrigued to find a home page with the headline: "I proclaim publicly that I favor ending government involvement in education."
He was even more intrigued with the name of one of the supporters Linda Abbott, a part of government's involvement in education since 2000 as a member of the Collier County School Board. Abbott takes the pledge on the Web site of the Alliance for the Separation of School and State (honestedu.org).
"How can she honor her obligations to public education and the students at Collier schools while being a signed member of an anti-public education group?" Dooley asks.
Abbott says she really doesn't believe that, because without public schools many children would not get an education. She says she signed up about six months ago as a show of support for local advocates of education competition and alternatives.
www.dooley08.com
#4 Posted by dooley on May 12, 2008 at 11:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm wondering if this will ever end. For every 1 abbott there are 100 more in line to replace her. Same with the rest of them. This District wasn't so bad 10 years ago.
#5 Posted by NaplesTeacher on May 12, 2008 at 11:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The paper recently quoted some board members as saying they wanted to fight this. LOL.
It seems the districts lawyers beat some sense into the small 3 who brought this on.
Baker could of made this very painful. The district's lawyers said that 2.5 million was built into the budget to cover this lawsuit. Only $800K was spent. Resulting in a positive of $1.7 million.
So who needs a new football field? Teachers?
#6 Posted by volochine on May 13, 2008 at 1:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The dies in this lawsuit were cast long before the lunatic fringe of the Board rushed to dump Ray Baker but rather in the giveaway contract they negotiated with him which virtually gurarantted him his full salary absent his death or criminal conviction during the length of his contractual appointment. When the lunatic fringe voted Baker out without due cause under the contract he became entitled to the $555,000.00 which the Board by this settlement is now agreeing to pay him, albeit after the expenditure of significant PUBLIC funds to attempt to justify their improper acts.
I for one, while feeling the settlement is required in law under the poorly enacted terms of the contract which the fringe, am interested in the alleged Sunshine law violations pleaded in the Baker complaint directed at Abbott, Donovan and our local lotharion, Calabrese, and in seeing how a good attorney can weave the already discovered acts by these three, plus those yet to be discovered through the deposition of Donovan, into a cause of action on which a jury might determine constitute a violoation of the Sunshine Law and generously award the plaintiff for their acts against him.
Unfortunately, when this lawsuit ends as it should through this settlement, our District still faces the same potential exposure to now Supt. Thompson when he is voted out for incompetence, whether real or perceived, by the new Board members who will be voted in to replace Abbott, Donovan and Calabese as their terms end, these unnecessary impositions coming from the even more generous giveaway contract granted by these same three to Supt. Thomposon.
Welcome to Rockford.
#7 Posted by chap914 on May 13, 2008 at 3:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The State Ethics Commission isn't very ethical. Neither was the Hinshaw & Culbertson report. Nor does Mr. Withers have the last word. What's financially best for the district has been for too long the criteria for the board's decisions. A settlement is not in the best interest of our school district.
That our community places political and economic expediency above morality and uses craft and deceit to maintain authority and to carry out discriminatory policies is wholly reprehensible and deserves utter condemnation. District employees from top to bottom have been intimidated and humiliated and oppressed.
Unpleasant as it is for everyone, Mr. Baker should go all the way.
Certain cancers must be excised with radical open-body surgery (not by changing the schedule, not by cutting teaching, guidance, ESE special assistants and custodial positions). This is the proper place for wielding scalpels. Craft, deceit, and economic expediency need to be wholly exposed and fully eliminated if our district is to achieve healthy recovery from its historic policies of pushing and trampling upon its most important people.
I disagree with former and current board members as well as with the current school administrators and the _Naples Daily News_. Collier County Public Schools is not a corporation cranking out widgets. We are not an arm of the military. What are we?
We don’t need to reinvent our nation’s high schools. We don’t need to reinvent 9th Grade. We don’t need to restructure our schedule. We don’t need to save (or make) more money.
We might begin a remodeling of the Board Chamber at the Martin Luther King Administrative Center. Exalted positions for these people above the rest of us seems quite ironical. In spite of the quality of character exhibited by the current occupants, the Skinnerian design of the space fosters an atmosphere of intimidation and fear and encourages those so exalted to overweening pride.
Mr. Baker should not settle out of court.
#8 Posted by HarrietGrandison on May 13, 2008 at 5:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I must respectfully disagree with the previous blogger.
Fiscal responsibility should be one of the top priorities of the School Board in every decision they make, whether it is as important as the settlement of this litigation or as mundane as whom to purchase chalkboard erasers from. The fact that we as taxpayers are getting out of this mess for merely half a million dollars and change instead of a potential multi-million dollar jury award should be applauded, not condemned.
I find it rather ironic that the same people who were screaming about that School Boarad's lack of fiscal responsibility during the teacher salary fiasco are now the very same people who are suggesting that Mr. Baker should pursue millions instead of settling for what is now on the table.
I have come to believe from reading the daily rants on here by many of the "regulars" that they would rather see the School Board spend millions more of our hard-earned tax dollars on a huge jury award just to see the School Board get a little more egg on their collective face and to confirm their ridiculous conspiracy theories and to simply be vindictive because they don't happen to agree with the School Board decisions, than to take this generous settlement offer and accept it for what it is...a gift. This is a pittance compared to what it could be.
I agree that we don't need to reinvent our nation's schools. But, we most definitely need to do something about those in Collier County, because what we have isn't working. The recent FACT scores prove that without a doubt. I was appalled that everyone was celebrating mediocrity so enthusiastically. The C+ grade that Florida received was generous and much higher than we deserve, and should be a blaring alarm to everyone who payes taxes into our public schools that we must demand our money's worth.
Replacing the current School Board is not the answer to the problem. Even if were possible to replace them all part and parcel, either by recall or by divine intervention from Governor Crist, what guarantee do we have that the people who replace them would do a better job? How do we know they wouldn't be as bad (or worse)? The answer is: We don't know. And, we can't know. All we can do is fill the contested seats with whomever we feel will do the best job.
That's the beauty of our democratic system of government. We get exactly what the majority wants, every time. We have no one to blame for the failures of our political figures, because we are the ones responsible for putting them into office. We deserve what we get. The only thing that elections guarantee is that we will get the best liar or the best promise maker, not necessarily the best candidate for the job.
Mr. Baker should most definitely settle out of court, and the School Board should be grateful that he is willing to do so.
#9 Posted by Pianoman8869 on May 13, 2008 at 5:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I say " Let's outsource everything- custodians, ADMINSTRATORS, teachers, food workers, bus drivers, the kids, their parents- everything to the lowest bidder"! After 35 years of all this nonsense I am outta here May 30, 2008 at 3 PM. Gone Fishing! Gone kayaking! Gone running! Gone biking! Baby sitting my new granddaughter!
#10 Posted by biomanogt on May 13, 2008 at 6:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Gator - to my recollection the Judge ruled on a motion for summary judgment and held that on all causes of action the motion did not lie and that the issues of fact would have to be determined by a petit jury. I don't believe he tossed anything.
But why argue - the fact is that Abbott, Donovan and Calabrese have been doing contractual harm to the District both with the Baker contract and the Thompson contract, leaving the public's pocketbook exposed. Frankly the stench of being obligated to pay these mediocre "educators" irrespective of their performance is offensive.
#11 Posted by chap914 on May 13, 2008 at 6:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
GatorHater.............Hate to share this with you my friend but you are in error concerning the Judges ruling! Please read it, he did not say no violation occured........ it was a procedurial order and easily over turned! Read it and you will understand!
#12 Posted by teachtrouble on May 13, 2008 at 7:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
A very big part of the reason public schools have become bastions of mediocrity is that schools are run by the public, not by professionals. More and more each year, students and parents take every little issue of poor grades or perceived injustice straight to the newspapers and straight to the school board. What happened to teaching kids to suck it up and learn that often life is not fair? Before any of you bloggers jump all over me with past grievances, please consider the atmosphere that has been created by this constant drama. What have the kids learned from all this? If you drop your pants at a school function, get a slightly lower class rank than the kid next to you, or fail to attend classes so that you are excluded from prom, all you need do is run to the newspaper and half of Naples will be weighing in on your side and saying that it's no big deal. You want to know why our kids are not succeeding in the world comparison of school achievement? They do not have the intestinal fortitude to take any lumps and get on with the job, and their parents are taking their complaints to their college professors now. It's not about prayer; it's not about test scores. It's about giving the schools the power to teach the important life lessons that give them the strength to get through life. Did any of you have a teacher that was not a good teacher? What did you learn? Maybe you had to learn to study on your own; maybe you had to learn to keep your mouth shut; maybe you had to learn that sometimes the kid next to you really is a better student. These are things that can make a profound difference in later life -- much more than any subject matter.
I'm not saying we should not look for excellent teachers for our classrooms (and we already have many excellent ones), but excellent teachers will follow when they know they are going to be backed up by the administration and the parents. In this town too often people mistake teachers who give their kids A's for excellent teachers. Sometimes that is the case, but sometimes those are the very teachers who simply play the game. Most of their students get A's, and the kids know the class is a joke. They take it anyway and keep their mouths shut so they can get an A for their transcript. I've seen it happen, and the parents come to school raving about what a wonderful teacher So-and-so is.
As for Baker and his contract, that's not the real issue. The real issue is the micromanagement of the school system by many who haven't a clue as to what makes a good school system.
Okay, I'm finished ranting now. I can go back to retirement.
#13 Posted by teachercreature on May 13, 2008 at 7:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
" I'm thankful to all the people who said NO to me- it made me have to do it/figure it by myself"
Dr. Wayne Dyer
#14 Posted by biomanogt on May 13, 2008 at 7:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Back to the news article -
Why would these people think they are so important to impart their opinions on the existing board. Who do they represent? Why do they want this mess swept under the rug? Do they not want Baker to "go to trial"? Are they really afraid for the school district, or are they afraid of Baker's clan getting smeared through an open trial? Do they represent the under-the-table gifts and gratuities of the business community? How much equipment has been bought by the school system under Baker, and ended up in administrator's personal usage? I know of one principle that did it under Baker, and she got caught and dismissed due to local school complaints, not Admin center investigations.
Baker has a lot to hide, or he wouldn't consent to the diminished return. These elitist former bureaucrats are covering their own clan's rears.
I'm suspicious and cynical of their medaling in this affair!
#15 Posted by cornandbeans on May 13, 2008 at 8:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Do not settle. Let the truth come out!
Chap, some food for thought.
You said: to my recollection the Judge ruled on a motion for summary judgment and held that on all causes of action the motion did not lie and that the issues of fact would have to be determined by a petit jury. I don't believe he tossed anything.
You are right, but Baker was counting on a summary favorable ruling which he did not get. He has since acquiesced to the fact there was no violation(stated above). The fact he has settled for the small amount speaks volumes. He didn't want a trial to begin with. It was a tactical legal bluff. Not only was it called, but a legitimate countersuit was filed. Too much information about too many people would have been revealed. Chamber people were horrified.
#16 Posted by Estatesdude on May 13, 2008 at 8:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Your analysis is spot on, Nekayah. Baker should not settle. He would do the community a favor by exposing the disease. Transparency is vital.
#17 Posted by rahga on May 13, 2008 at 9:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Unpleasant as it is for everyone, Mr. Baker should go all the way.
He knows it would be unpleasant for him.
#18 Posted by Estatesdude on May 13, 2008 at 9:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
EstatesDude........... You know NOTHING concerning the details, issues or facts! You are a Calabrese puppet! Why dont you just go kiss his ring!
Your facts are in amazing error! I realize that will continue as you have no clue!
I truly hope this does not settle!
#19 Posted by teachtrouble on May 13, 2008 at 9:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
cornandbeans,
I agree. Why would NDN bring the old board members into this unless they wanted to stir the pot> First they said the public would lose if this didn't go to court. Now they get this group of people who say: “Putting aside other issues which may be pursued in the future, our concern is for the fiscal well-being of the Collier Country School District"
What relationship or interest did any of these people have with Ray Baker? Are the future issues they are talking about the Nelson Faerber case?
Crappy investigative journalism. Great sensationalism!
#20 Posted by ww2vet on May 13, 2008 at 9:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Let's not forget that Donodumb was NOT deposed, because he ran from the scheduled tme and got an attorney. Classic action from an innocent man right. So the issues of Sunshine Law violations were never completely answered. Selfishness begs for a trail and more trouble for the 3 idiots, with the dream of having Thompson's contract deemed null & void. Too bad for CCPS that will never happen.
So settle the thing, and let's get back to the next dumb thing these 4 morons will come up with.......like firing 250 custodians for a reduced level of maintainence, little to no real savings, and another notch in the dictators belt making Collier slowly become Rockford south.
#21 Posted by sowestfla1975 on May 13, 2008 at 9:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I will defend a persons right to speak even if they are rather supid! That being said, I just wonder how much some of these Baker Bashers have ever done for this community other then belly ache and point out spelling errors!
Abbott-Donavan-Calabrese set out to destroy public education in Collier County and have done a remarkable job with the task! A frustrated housewife, a want to be actor, and a Publix stock clerk, have changed the direction of education! We have meet the enemy, "it is us" for allowing these people to hold office by voting them in! They may have been stupid but we are the dumb ones we gave them the job!
now just to make the puppets happy you can aviod the issues by finding the 7 spelling errors in this entry! I made them just so your day could be complete!
#22 Posted by teachtrouble on May 13, 2008 at 10:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
teach,
I actually worked in that mess. I do know the details. I also know what happened in the taj. And about those errors. You didn't do them on purpose...lol
#23 Posted by Estatesdude on May 13, 2008 at 10:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)
An office manager at BCH years ago was told to change F-cat scores under Baker, they were't good enough! Who did these old board members confine in Curatolo? I don't understand how baker gets 550,000? 2 years of salary comes to roughly 300,000. His insurance is separate.
P.S. I heard from several plant operators yesterday that GCA is all but a done deal. At a meeting yesterday, they were told they will be taking bids, because they have too by law, plant operators are not to talk to anyone, direct all questions to Administration. Board votes in middle of June. New company in place by July 1st!
#24 Posted by upnorth on May 13, 2008 at 10:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Well, that easily explians it EstatesDude, you are a bitter man from having worked in the system. Something or someone caught up to you and now it is your chance to grind that axe! Thanks for the info, I understand better now!
Oh about those errors, I see it really did make your day! lmao!
some advice, take it or leave it, get over it and go on! it will make you even more bitter!
#25 Posted by teachtrouble on May 13, 2008 at 10:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I don't usually partake, but this is getting really funny. Cornandbeans, estatesdude, ww2vet,you all make sense. The others continue with their nonsense. When I see their names, I just skim through, sometimes not reading at all. It's like a broken record, and it's getting tiresome.
All the same, I don't understand who these people think they are to think that other people should care what they think? What arrogance! If I were a member of the present Board, I would intentionally vote against their recommendation. If this group wants to weigh in, let them run for the Board and vote themselves.
It won't matter anyway. I think the settlement will be voted down. It almost has to be.
#26 Posted by aman4allseasons on May 13, 2008 at 10:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
aman4allseasons......... "let people express themselves if the agree with you" Hey how about the people you are siding with running for school board if they have so much to offer!!!!!!!!!!1
lmao.......yeah right!
#27 Posted by teachtrouble on May 13, 2008 at 10:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Upnorth, office managers cannot change FCAT scores. There are only a couple of people in a high school building who can do that -- the data entry person and perhaps the principal and the AP. Furthermore, those scores are sent by the state, and the state calculates the school's scores based on the info THEY produce, not based on what is on file in the building. In addition, while I'm not absolutely sure about this, I believe the scores are actually entered electronically by the state. I don't even think building data entry people can change them. I do know that even guidance counselors cannot go in and change things on a kid's record. They can only change his schedule. The system is set up on an as needed basis. You only get the access you need. Is it foolproof? Of course not. I just question the validity of your information. For one thing, there is no such thing at the high school as an "office manager." And the principal's secretary's access to test scores is "read only."
#28 Posted by teachercreature on May 13, 2008 at 11:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Upnorth- there is NO WAY on Gods' green earth that Mr. Baker could change FCAT scores! The results ( scores) come from the State and are etched in stone! Now, how they are reported to the public and perceived by the public is a different story! A good "statistics spin doctor" can make even the worse scores look acceptable/bearable!
#29 Posted by biomanogt on May 13, 2008 at 11:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
VOTE FOR A TRIAL!!!!! VOTE FOR A TRIAL!!!!! VOTE FOR A TRIAL!!!!
LET THE LIGHT SHINE IN!!!!!
#30 Posted by promdate on May 13, 2008 at 11:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
No settlement. Go to trial. Let the truth come out in public. Why would Baker settle for so little if he is so right? Also, can anyone tell us if he has applied for or received another job? Not that it matters for this but does anyone else want him?
#31 Posted by DinNaples on May 13, 2008 at 11:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
cornandbeans: I think you left out; are they communists, did they hate their mothers, did they not wear flag lapel pins?
I suppose, since they have actually been in the position of board members, they felt that their opinion does count. Maybe they just felt that as Americans they have a right to share their opinion. I hope you aren't suggesting they don't have that right, the same as you and I.
#32 Posted by beenthere_56 on May 13, 2008 at 11:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
teach,
Sorry, I don't have an axe to grind. I had a very rewarding career and retired very happily. I felt I made a difference in children's lives. They still call me to this day. Unlike many who just talk here, I still volunteer my time. Can you say the same?
#33 Posted by Estatesdude on May 13, 2008 at 11:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks to the others for pointing out that FCAT scores cannot be changed at the school level(or the administrative level). It is NOT possible. Jeez!
#34 Posted by beenthere_56 on May 13, 2008 at 11:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)
" - A judge already ruled during a summary judgement hearing while the depositions were being taken that there were no Sunshine Law violations, and that no basis to continue with that part of Baker's complaint had been established" Ummm this is interesting. How can a judge rule as such while depositions were still being taken? If this is true how can a judge make a ruling without all the evidence and testimony?Sounds kind of shoddy and unprofessional to me. I would expect more from a judge. This also sounds kind of fishy to me. Why else would a judge rule as such without all the evidence and testimony in front of him or her?Unless of course something was not right here.
#35 Posted by Argo34116 on May 13, 2008 at 12:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Of course previous school board members and superintendents want the agreement. Under provisions of the settlement, all liabilities are dissolved with no penalty.
An investigation of accounting, leasebacks, contracts and purchase orders would show corruption, fraud, and misappropriation of funds. This agreement absolves all wrongdoing. An audit from 1992-present would show conspiracy, corruption, and political wrongdoing with many laws broken.
Look at the foundations, titles of schools, and COPS (Certificates of Participation). Who owns the schools the public paid for with taxpayers' dollars?
The public should step up on this one and the county commissioners, LOOK AT THE LAW! Baker broke many, many laws, and moral responsibility. So did the School Boards.
The public, taxpayers, and students got duped. They should not be saddled with paying for the financial wrongdoing of a select few.
#36 Posted by Naplesinsider on May 13, 2008 at 12:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Now that ex-school board members have had their say I am just wondering. What would Nelson Faerber do?
T
#37 Posted by swampbuggy on May 13, 2008 at 12:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
You really want to know who owns the schools? The mortgage companies. Yes, they are mortgaged. Check the records. What happened to the money earmarked to pay for them? Which real estate person's name shows up on most land transactions? Possibly an ex-superintendent? I'll bet this will trigger even more questions!
#38 Posted by Estatesdude on May 13, 2008 at 12:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
as much as we ( or most of us) would like to see this go to trial and see the "truth" come out, ultimately it comes down to 6 people voting/deciding and that would be the 5 school bored ( ha, ha) members and Ray Baker! It will be settled come Thursday May 15th and be forgotten by May 16th!
#39 Posted by biomanogt on May 13, 2008 at 12:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I have officially given my letter of resignation today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am a free woman!!!!!!!!
I will miss the students and my colleagues terribly, but I figure in a few years I can return to a better CCPS system. Right now it's not worth the pain this admin., board, and super cause myself and my friends.
I have never felt such a huge load off of my shoulders. Wow! I never thought I'd leave teaching for even a minute much less a few years (minimum I'm sure).
#40 Posted by NaplesTeacher on May 13, 2008 at 12:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)
lololololol that and then some, Thankfully I am confident and Blessed enough that I do not feel the need to toot my own horn!
EstatesDude, I am glad you feel like you made a difference, I'm thrilled people still keep up with you, I just hope you show and share better and less bitter Character with those people!
I care about the kids and the system and am tired of seeing people attempt to destroy public education.
#41 Posted by teachtrouble on May 13, 2008 at 1:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
NaplesTeacher.......... Whatever the views or issues I wish you the best and thank you for the service given to our kids!
#42 Posted by teachtrouble on May 13, 2008 at 1:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Naplesteacher,
Hopefully many more people will show gratitude for your years of service. Good luck in the future. Remember, there IS life after CCPS! And it is good!
#43 Posted by Estatesdude on May 13, 2008 at 1:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I have been blessed to work in some wonderful programs for youth in this community. I have had the thrill of seeing lives forever changed. In these experiences I have seen the kids benifit from the work of the Chamber. I have had the support of people like Ray Baker and Dick Bruce in many needed situations.
I do not apologize for supporting what I have seen help in our community. Shame on those who pretend to be for the community when the are about themselves. Guess what folks, without special interest nothing would ever get done!
I would love personally for this not to settle just so the truth could rise to the top and shut some of these "know it alls" up! However enough is enough and at some point it is time to move forward!
anyone who might want to be part of truly making a difference you can contact me at teachtrouble2002@yahoo.com I for one am willing to step forward and not hide like some of these so called.................
#44 Posted by teachtrouble on May 13, 2008 at 1:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I , too, would like to hear the testimony from this going to trial.
However, that just doesn't make financial sense at this time. I'm not sure how much of the $550,000 is paid by the insurance company, but I'm sure there would be tremendous legal bills from a long drawn out trial.( that there is no guarantee we would win ,anyway)
As far as the part 3 board members had in all this, as is so often said here, if it walks like a duck, looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's probably a duck!!!
;-)
#45 Posted by Optipess on May 13, 2008 at 2:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thank you so much for your kind words. I am now mourning my "loss", but I know I will be happy come June 1st. I will be working for a law firm until I feel CCPS is a workable environment. My prayers are that the children do not suffer while these people are controlling things.
#46 Posted by NaplesTeacher on May 13, 2008 at 4:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I hear ya, NaplesTeacher! Lee County schools look better each day, even with the cut in pay!
#47 Posted by GoIndians on May 13, 2008 at 6:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The judge's ruling about sufficient evidence was rendered BEFORE the depositions began. Once the groper was deposed it was clear he had been in contact with the other 2 blind mice. Terry "I'm a fake Harvard guy" Walters had a salary offer for Thompson when he went to visit. Only a fool would think he made that figure up on his own or with only 1 board member's input. He was the conduit for the illegal communication.
GED boy will certainly agree to pay because he does not want to be deposed. He skipped his deposition twice out of fear of the truth. The problem is that we taxpayers will have to pay the bill to go to trial and find out the truth. Watch for the posturing on this item when it comes up for a vote. The 3 blind mice will all cite financial woes, but are relieved to have this ticking bomb defused. All 6 must all go, starting with Abbott, and finishing with Thompson and the chicks.
#48 Posted by estatesdude2 on May 13, 2008 at 8:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
ED2 - you are probably correct, they will most likely settle and blame it on money - make some lame-o excuse, but be relieved that they escaped unscathed - Calabrese and Walters were walking hand in hand this evening - and wondered, what were they talking about so intently - hmmmmmm - Inquiring minds........ what could they be up to now - all huddled up????? what a hazy shade of gray -
#49 Posted by bozosunlimited on May 13, 2008 at 9:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
EstateDude2:
Excellent blog and very perceptive insights. Bravo!
You're right - Walters wouldn't have gone on just a go-ahead from good pal Calabrese alone. And Thompson wouldn't have taken all the time with Walters if there hadn't been a whole lot more backing up that interview and potential offer.
Hit the nail on the head.
#50 Posted by RitaPearl5197 on May 13, 2008 at 10:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
upnorth - you are flaunting your ignorance when you talk about ANYONE local changing FCAT scores. Those tests are scored by the state, not locally, and there is a huge amount of security around the entire endeavor. After they are scored CCPS receives scores electronically from the state. No office clerk can change them. If you are going to make accusations make them credible!
#51 Posted by mags156 on May 13, 2008 at 11:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)