Home › News › Environment
$8.5 million state earmark will help FGCU go to solar power
RELATED STORIES
- FGCU, Regenesis Power begin construction on solar energy field
- Solar energy heats up with FGCU, FPL plans
- FGCU president talks about expansion, fee hikes and “greening” of campus
Related Links
More Environment
- South Florida Watershed Journal: November weather summary for Naples
- PHOTOS/POLL: 100 percent electric vehicles on sale at North Fort Myers dealership
- Panther killed on Oil Well Road
Tell us about it
- What would you add to this story? Tell us what we missed.
- Do you have photos from this event? Documents we need to see? Share with us.
- Upload photos & videos
- More ways to get your stuff online and in the paper.
STORY TOOLS
Share and Enjoy [?]
TALLAHASSEE Barring any political flares, Florida Gulf Coast University will become a worldwide showcase for solar power, thanks in large part to an $8.5 million boost from the state.
Despite a lean budget year, lawmakers saw fit to help the Southwest Florida institution on its quest to become more energy independent by building a $17 million solar array that will provide up to a third of its electrical power.
“Florida and the governor have indicated that we would lead by example in the use of alternative energy,” said Sen. Burt Saunders, R-Naples. “This project backs up that promise.”
Gov. Charlie Crist has yet to sign the budget and has the authority to veto particular items. But Crist has made alternative energy production a priority during his first term in office.
Crist announced proudly earlier this year that the pool at the governor’s mansion is now heated by solar panels. Such a stance bodes well for the FGCU project’s success.
“I’ve met with the governor, and he is 100 percent behind it,” said Saunders, the Senate sponsor of Crist’s energy package approved by lawmakers earlier this month.
Joe Shepard, FGCU vice president for administrative services and finance, said Monday that plans call for the university to send out bid requests to the private sector in July with the hopes of signing a contract in September. The state dollars are contingent on a private match.
Groundbreaking could come as early as October with completion of the project slated for May 2009.
“We’ve talked to some people,” Shepard said. “The (bid winner) will have to be someone with experience and the financial backing to put up ($8.5 million).”
Once complete, the solar array will provide about 33 percent of the university’s power needs, saving the institution nearly $1 million a year in fuel costs. During down times, the institution also will be able to sell power back to Florida Power & Light Co., Saunders said.
“This will be the largest university solar project probably in the world,” Saunders said. “(FGCU) is an environmentally sensitive university and having this project there is part of their mission.”
The solar array will need about 16 acres to produce 2 megawatts of power. Of the university’s about 750 acres, about 340 is available for construction.
Plans are to place some of the panels on building roofs, but there isn’t enough square footage atop buildings to accomplish the entire task.
Shepard said the remainder of the array would be placed in the least intrusive portions of the campus.
“We’re not going to be building on any wetlands or other environmentally sensitive areas,” Shepard said.
---
E-mail Michael Peltier at mpeltier1234@comcast.net







Comments
This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below. Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. Break our rules, and we will ban you. No exceptions, no second chances. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.
nice
#1 Posted by ajc239 on May 19, 2008 at 9:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Do not WASTE tax money.
Request offers from PRIVATE investors.
Solar FRAUD http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?...
#2 Posted by jacktanner on May 19, 2008 at 11:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
That is an eye opening read jacktanner.
#3 Posted by RainMan on May 19, 2008 at 11:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I think this is absolutely an amazing concept and hope to see it come to fruition.
At least some positive news is coming out of the feeds these days.
No matter the political motives that may be involved in this plan or decision by the state officials, I whole-heartedly am very pleased to see this step being made forward.
#4 Posted by naplesrunnerxc13 on May 20, 2008 at 6:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Don't miss JackTanner link.
#5 Posted by BonitaSprings1 on May 20, 2008 at 7:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)
JackTanner, that artical is 6 years old. "They also recognize that solar energy—using all conceivable technologies—will not be adequate to run an industrialized world." All conceivable as of 6 years ago.
Anyhow Howard Hayden doesnt belive in global warming so he seems to be missing the big picture.
I am proud to see Americans in fuel cost crisis mode. Need is the mother of invention. And we need a industral renaissance.
#6 Posted by Tsaot on May 20, 2008 at 7:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Jacktanner fans:
our energy problems will not be solved with one solution, but many. This is one very good solution, especially since the system will pay for itself over time. I would imagine the summer will be a boon for FGCU, school is out (less power use), and the sun is blaring.. FPL will be paying for alternative fuel and that helps us all.
Hybrid cars, wind power, hydro power in combination with other will reduce our dependency on traditional fuels, ALL GOOD!
#7 Posted by ballarino on May 20, 2008 at 8:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
jacktanner,,
As noted, the article you cite by Lehr is 6 years old. efficiencies in solar and wind production will only continue to grow. The heartland article cited figures from 6 years ago that it would take 127 square miles to produce 1,000 megawatts of power. FGCU will produce 2 megawatts with only 16 acres.
There are 640 acres in a square mile. Therefore, 1 square mile with the same type solar generation as will be in place at FGCU would produce 80 megawatts. 127 square miles would produce 10,160 megawatts. So, if no more research was done to make solar more efficient in the future, then it would still be 1160% more productive than Lehr's estimates. Lehr's estimates about wind power are similarly off.
Not included in the $1,000,000 per year energy savings is benefits that come from energy independence. This is a great investment, even if the state was paying the full $17 million. We are getting it at half price.
#8 Posted by POC on May 20, 2008 at 8:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Amazing. They cut the budgets forcing state run higher ed institutions to impose enrollment caps, but find a way to blow a chunk of money on solar arrays? What makes FGCU so special? Don't get me wrong, I'm as pro-green as the next person, but that's a lot of money that could have been better spent.
#9 Posted by jt1120 on May 20, 2008 at 9:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
A lot of money spent. But the money they will save from electricity will compensate
#10 Posted by ricky369 on May 20, 2008 at 1:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Solar power technology is growing by leaps and bounds, the future holds the promise of 'Solar' coatings that can be applied directly to building surfaces to generate power.
While it may not be sufficient to power the vast transportation networks of the world it can power nearly every single family residence on the planet.
It is grossly stupid to ignore the source that creates all energy on Earth.
#11 Posted by cupcake on May 20, 2008 at 2:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)
lets just drill for our own oil and build more nuke plants which don't pollute. we need lots more gas and diesel for the millions of vehicles on the road which we will be stuck with for many years to come.
there is no yellow brick road dorothy and there is no wizard of oz.
nothing wrong with solar but its not going to solve all the problems of energy today.
#12 Posted by zo6fun on May 20, 2008 at 3:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Solar doesn't just mean solar panels. Passive solar can reduce costs of heating water, effectively. Use of landscaping and trees to block the sun from hitting buildings prevents solar energy from heating them up saving money on cooling the buildings. Solar is an assistant power source it is not a system all itself, but if solar can assist for it's most applicable uses and save energy and stop emissions then it will be productive.
It would also be beneficial if this program included gray water use, cisterns and water collection systems as well. Every bit helps especially in a controlled campus.
#13 Posted by kneejerk on May 20, 2008 at 3:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Why does everyone think Nuclear Power doesn't pollute?
The waste created lasts thousands of years and has to be dealt with.
#14 Posted by cupcake on May 20, 2008 at 5:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
As a leading and global renewable energy industry executive and full-time Naples resident, I would like to offer my sincerest congratulations to FGCU on this wonderful and exciting initiative! Let me state clearly that SW Florida is way behind other parts of the country and world in all things sustainabi; however I am trilled at this is a great, great step.
Mother Earth knows nothing about politics. At the national level this is increasingly not a democrat vs. republican issue.
Keep up the great work and I truly hope that many residents will follow through and deploy either Solar PV or Solar Thermal Energy on their businesses and residences!
#15 Posted by Noldes on May 20, 2008 at 5:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
another feel-good administrative waste of tax monies. this "system" will be installed, won't work, more money, and we will never hear about it again.
even if the sales pitch is correct is FGCU using that much electricity? if they want to be environmenal and all turn off a light or two!
hey, if this 16 acre electrical grid gets hit by lighting maybe they will save even more!
and Noldes, you make me want to puke pal. you all have been at this rip-off for a really long time now and the only positive result is the taxpayer rip-off called the International Space Station.
so, if you want to live in a tin can up in space or on a mountain somewhere where you can't run an extention cord solar panels are as good as you're gonna get. want to run a Nation? you're gonna need someting reliable and sustainable 24/7/365. which is what we have. let's improve on what works, as we have been.
#16 Posted by mimibuck on May 20, 2008 at 7:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
When are all the taxpayers going to wise up. This project WILL NOT save money. It WON'T WORK. It will be a gravy train for a select few. Government DOES NOT solve problems. It creates them. What a bunch of bumbling idiots. Seems it's easy to p*ss away other peoples money.
#17 Posted by cousinjed on May 20, 2008 at 9:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)
All govt bujildings in SWFL should produce solar power. The naysayers can move to the Middle East if they are so in love with oil.
#18 Posted by POC on May 20, 2008 at 10:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Why fool around?
Donate 50-100 acres FGCU to FPL. See if they'll factor this "money maker".
#19 Posted by BonitaSprings1 on May 21, 2008 at 8:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)