Home › News › Local news
Collier commissioners postpone vote on proposed schools referendum
RELATED STORIES
- Collier School Board tweaks referendum language
- Referendum to reallocate money to Collier schools operating budgets will be on August primary ballot
Related Links
More Local news
- Local Christian academy offers homeschoolers option in SW Florida
- Lely High hosts basketball shootout
- FGCU, Edison State College form new partnership
Tell us about it
- What would you add to this story? Tell us what we missed.
- Do you have photos from this event? Documents we need to see? Share with us.
- Upload photos & videos
- More ways to get your stuff online and in the paper.
STORY TOOLS
Share and Enjoy [?]
Collier County School Board members want to make sure voters know what they are agreeing to when they are asked to approve a referendum that could bring millions of dollars in operating funds to the School District.
But board members will have to make their proposal a little less long-winded if they want it to be put on the ballot.
Collier County commissioners, who must approve the referendum, voted unanimously Tuesday to continue the request to a June 10 meeting.
The School Board was asking the commissioners to put a referendum on the Aug. 26 primary ballot. The referendum would allow the district to lower its capital property tax by 0.25 mils, or 25 cents per $1,000 of assessed value, in order to raise the property tax in the general fund by the same amount.
The commissioners voted to continue the request because the School District provided ballot language that was 94 words, which is 19 words too long for a ballot.
Collier Supervisor of Elections Jennifer Edwards said state law limits the number of words on the ballot to 75. Edwards asked commissioners to continue the issue until their June 10 meeting, saying she didn’t feel comfortable telling them to approve something that, at face value, could violate state statute.
“I am sure if we all work together, we can get this resolution on the ballot,” she said.
All ballot language must be submitted by the June 20 filing deadline.
Commission Chairman Tom Henning said he was disappointed no one from the School District came to the meeting to discuss the proposal.
“I was hoping for a better dialogue,” he said.
Henning suggested that the commissioners vote the request down, but was overruled by his fellow commissioners who said they could continue the request and notify the district about the error.
School Board Attorney Richard Withers said the district was working on the language and would resubmit the request. He said some of the confusion came over whether numbers, as in, 0.25 mils, would be considered words. The district didn’t believe that the numbers should be considered words, but they are, he said.
School Board members voted unanimously at their May 15 meeting to ask that the measure be put on the Aug. 26 primary ballot.
School leaders emphasized the referendum will be tax neutral, meaning taxpayers wouldn’t be asked to take on any additional burden.
But Henning questioned how the referendum would affect impact fees. He said by moving 0.25 mils from capital to operating, the district could substantially increase impact fees. He said it would be a question the district would have to answer in the coming weeks.
The issue of a referendum came up during the School Board’s February meeting. Board member Kathleen Curatolo told fellow board members she received an e-mail from a community member about an option Monroe County used to solve its operations budget shortfall.
Monroe County found the money by passing a voter referendum about four years ago, to reallocate part of its property taxes from capital funds to operating. The measure passed and Monroe County received $13 million.
The money collected from the referendum could help the School District offset budget constraints from a state revenue shortfall. The district already made more than $10 million in cuts this year and district officials expect that number to grow even higher next year.
Superintendent Dennis Thompson was wary of moving forward, though, saying publicly that he thought a rift between the teachers’ union and the district would result in a failed referendum. That opinion later changed after discussions with Cal Boggess, the president of the Collier County Education Association, which represents 80 percent of the district’s teachers.
If Collier voters approve the referendum, the district could collect millions for its operating fund by 2009-10.







Comments
This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below. Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. Break our rules, and we will ban you. No exceptions, no second chances. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.
Tom Henning was hoping for better communication from the Superintendent??? Mr. Henning must not be aware of the issues facing the school district. Communication would not be a trait used to describe Dr. Thompson. How is it the School Board attorney did not know about the limit on the number of words that can appear on the ballot?
#1 Posted by harley2 on May 27, 2008 at 4:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Do notice that Harley2 said "number of words" and that the article says "amount of words." Anybody know the difference? Who's right?
Of course what's really right is "allow capital funds to be transfered to operating funds." It's quite simple. Instead of wasting money on physical items like flat computer screens and cement football fields, give the money to the people (the teachers, the custodians, the bus folks, the cafeteria workers). People are more important than things.
Schools are full of flesh and blood. Manipulating numbers doesn't address the problem. People first.
#2 Posted by dwyerj1 on May 27, 2008 at 5:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Nekayah, if you want the referendum to be legal, then the law needs to be followed. (Katherine Harris is no longer Secretary of State.)
#3 Posted by BlueTonguedVole on May 27, 2008 at 5:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Now their is a name out of the past (C H). You must have watched that so called HBO movie to bring that person up. Did you have a flashback?
#4 Posted by suntan on May 27, 2008 at 6:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
IMHO this should be a state referendum as it should cover all school boards, not just the whiners.
2% budget reduction should not be a "crisis". particularly with droping student FTE.
local control of local taxs should be a given, not a State Mandate.
also the legislature must overrule the "class size reduction act" as it is another "bullit train amendment" that we cannot afford! oh, too late, we've already spent $100s of millions on this fiasco!
ok, i'll shut up.
#5 Posted by mimibuck on May 27, 2008 at 7:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
And its truly amazing that no School Board members showed up! Or is it???
And why did the School Board members have to wait for an e-mail from Monroe County to get wind of the referendum idea? Does the word "pro-active" mean anything to these elected officials?
I Call It Sleep (sorry Henry Roth).
www.dooley08.com
2,350 hits already
#6 Posted by dooley on May 27, 2008 at 9:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
suntan, Yep, I watched the HBO movie. Had a nightmare after that too...oh, had the nightmare BEFORE the movie, in 2000.
I once lived a tad further north of SWFlorida...near Katherine dearest's old riding grounds.
#7 Posted by BlueTonguedVole on May 27, 2008 at 11:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Why do anything that would help the taxpayer?
It's not like this can be worked out.
IDIOTS!!!!!!!!!!
;-)
#8 Posted by Optipess on May 28, 2008 at 8:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I know the difference. If it can be counted, it would be number. If you're considering the amount as a whole, you actually do say amount; therefore, since the whole concept centers on the number of words being too many, one would say "number".
Good thing the school board isn't a corporation. Would have gone belly up years ago...
#9 Posted by lizzyb on May 28, 2008 at 8:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
VOTE NO!
#10 Posted by upnorth on May 29, 2008 at 5:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)