Home › Business News › Business news
Dow plunges 733 on new disheartening economic data
RELATED STORIES
More Business news
- Christmas Island Style Gala to celebrate Marco’s top community contributors
- Local travel agency president named to Forbes Traveler Board of Experts
- Serenity offers respite from everyday pressures
Tell us about it
- What would you add to this story? Tell us what we missed.
- Do you have photos from this event? Documents we need to see? Share with us.
- Upload photos & videos
- More ways to get your stuff online and in the paper.
STORY TOOLS
Share and Enjoy [?]
NEW YORK The economy lurched deeper into the doldrums Wednesday and took the stock market down with it, sending the Dow Jones industrials to a staggering 733-point loss and erasing any hopes that the convulsions that have shaken Wall Street for a month were over.
The daylong sell-off came as retailers reported the biggest drop in sales in three years and as a Federal Reserve snapshot showed Americans are spending less and manufacturing is slowing around the country.
Piling up losses in a rough final hour of trading, the Dow ended the day down nearly 8 percent - its steepest drop since one week after Black Monday in 1987. The Dow has wiped out all but about 127 points of its record-shattering 936-point gain on Monday of this week.
Earlier this week, after governments around the world announced plans to use trillions of dollars to prop up banks, including a U.S. plan to buy about $250 billion in bank stocks, the market had appeared to be turning around - or at least calming down.
Instead, relentless selling gave the Dow its 20th triple-digit swing in the past 23 trading sessions, an unprecedented run of volatility. The Dow has finished higher on only one day this month. The loss of 733 points is the second-worst ever for the average, topped only by a 778-point decline Sept. 29.
The plunge in stocks put the nation's economic anxiety front-and-center as the two major presidential candidates, Sens. Barack Obama and John McCain, prepared for their final debate Wednesday night in Hempstead, N.Y.
In the meantime, the man they each hope to succeed met with his Cabinet. President Bush predicted "in the long run that this economy will come back."
Bush plans to speak on the financial crisis early Friday - before the markets open - at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce headquarters across from the White House. Officials said the speech wasn't intended to put forward new policy actions, but president would instead give a more detailed explanation of what the government is doing - and why - to combat the crisis.
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke expressed confidence that the government's radical efforts to stabilize the financial system and induce banks to lend again will eventually help the economy.
But Bernanke warned that even if the financial markets level off, the nation will not snap back to economic health quickly.
"Stabilization of the financial markets is a critical first step, but even if they stabilize as we hope they will, broader economic recovery will not happen right away," Bernanke told the Economic Club of New York.
Paulson, making the rounds of network TV morning shows, struck a similar note. "This will take time. There will be challenges," he said on ABC's "Good Morning America."
Some analysts believe the economy jolted into reverse in the recently ended third quarter, while others predict it will shrink later this year or early next. The classic definition of a recession is back-to-back quarters of shrinking economic activity.
Two gloomy economic reports showed that the debate at this point is merely semantic.
The Fed's snapshot of business conditions around the nation, known as the Beige Book, showed economic activity weakening across all of the Fed's 12 regional districts. Consumer spending - which accounts for more than two-thirds of economic activity - slumped in most Fed regions. Manufacturing also slowed in most areas.
As shoppers cut back, retail sales dropped sharply in September. The 1.2 percent decline was the biggest in three years. Retail sales have fallen for three months in a row, the first time that's happened since the government began keeping comparable records in 1992.
Analysts had expected only a 0.7 percent decline. And as Americans watch their nest eggs shrink before their eyes on days like Wednesday on Wall Street, there's little reason to expect they will shop with gusto anytime soon.
Leaders of the world's top economic powers, the Group of Eight, said they would meet "in the near future" for a global summit to tackle the financial crisis. The group comprises the United States, Japan, Germany, France, Britain, Italy, Canada and Russia.
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said the meeting could be held as soon as next month. He said the discussions should include not only the world's richest nations but also major emerging economies such as China and India.
"I believe there is scope for agreement in the next few days that we will have an international meeting to take common action ... for very large and very radical changes," Brown told reporters before a meeting with other European Union leaders for talks in Brussels on the financial crisis.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy also called for a G-8 meeting.
Merkel said reform was needed so that "something like this can never happen again," while Sarkozy said the meeting should be held in New York, "where everything started."
The current financial crisis began more than a year ago in the United States when lax lending standards on certain home mortgages came home to roost. Foreclosures skyrocketed, mortgage securities soured and financial companies racked up huge losses.
Credit remained strained Wednesday, and investors' appetite for super-safe investments stayed high. The three-month Treasury bill's yield slipped. Low yields show that investors are willing to earn meager returns as long as their investment is preserved.
Key lending rates between banks in the U.S. and Europe only inched down after major central banks offered the banking sector unlimited amounts of short-term loans in dollars. The move was meant to keep credit markets flowing while lenders regain confidence.
There was a dose of good news Wednesday: Oil prices dipped below $75 a barrel for the first time in nearly 14 months, suggesting gas prices will keep falling. Oil prices have now plunged almost 50 percent since peaking at $147.27 in mid July.
Associated Press writers Pan Pylas in London, Madlen Read and Patrick Rizzo in New York and Deb Riechmann, Christopher S. Rugaber and Martin Crutsinger in Washington contributed to this report.

















Comments
This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below. Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. Break our rules, and we will ban you. No exceptions, no second chances. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.
Why should the middle class keep supporting the upper class. Cindy, George and Dick can afford to pay increased taxes to spread the weatlh. So can their friends.
#1 Posted by chap914 on October 15, 2008 at 11:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)
chap914,
What the hell are you taking about? The middle class doesn't support the upper class!! The government spends too much money! That is the real problem. Taxes are meant to pay for government operation, not redistribute wealth because its unfair.
Also, I'm not upper class by any stretch of the imagination but I don't believe that I have any right to take money from people to "redistribute wealth"
Who cares that they can afford increased taxes, its not your money you moocher.
Unbelievable that these libs think its they God given right to other peoples hard work and success. How pathetic.
#2 Posted by Sanity on October 15, 2008 at 11:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The top 50% of income earners pay WAY over 90% of the taxes collected, so they're worried to pay even more under Obama.
#3 Posted by pauls on October 16, 2008 at 1:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
10% of the population in this country controls 90% of the wealth. But, proportionally, they pay less in taxes than the remaining 90% of the population.
It's time to eliminate all the deductions and loopholes, and institute a flat 15% income tax across the board. Individual or business, domestic or foreign, any money you make within the borders of the United States should be taxed at 15% of your gross earnings.
No tax credits or incentives for businesses. No deductions or exemptions or earned income credits for families or individuals. Everyone pays their fare share to the tune of 15%.
Wouldn't you love to see Warren Buffett or Bill Gates and people like that write a check to the government for 15% of the billions they make every year?
#4 Posted by Pianoman8869 on October 16, 2008 at 6:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Re: Post #6 - Why should I vote for Obama if my taxes are going to go up as a reward for doing so?
Obama will not institute a flat tax. No politician who wants to be re-elected will. A flat tax would take a significant amount of money from the people who help fund re-election campaigns and no politician, including Obama, will bite the hand that feeds them.
#5 Posted by Pianoman8869 on October 16, 2008 at 7:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Re: Post #10 - Yes and no, not that it's really any of your business.
I am a partner in a small business in addition to my regular job.
My annual gross income at my regular job is less than $250,000 per year. But, my small business typically averages between $350,000 and $500,000 gross income per year.
So, my personal income taxes wouldn't change under Obama but my small business income taxes would go up, because those are also taxed as individual income and not as business income.
Why would I vote for someone who is going to take more money out of my pocket? Especially at a time when business in general, and small business in particular, needs all the extra money it can get.
Obama cannot deliver the tax cuts he is promising and still fund all of the new programs that he is promising. He will need to increase spending to deliver those programs and that money has to come from somewhere. And, you can't cut taxes (revenues) and increase spending simultaneously without adding to the deficit.
So, is he lying to us now? Or, will he be lying to us in the future?
#6 Posted by Pianoman8869 on October 16, 2008 at 7:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Pianoman8869 - voting based solely on what it means for YOU, financial, is exactly why the republican party is dead.
#7 Posted by thedudesview on October 16, 2008 at 7:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Re: Post #12 - First, that argument only makes sense if all small business owners in America are Republicans. But, they aren't. So, all small business owners should be worried by Obama's tax plan, because all small business owners stand to lose more money in taxes if he is elected. Not just Republicans.
Second, why shouldn't I cast my vote based solely on what it means for me? I'm certainly not going to vote based upon what my neighbor wants or what my boss wants or what my friends want. Are you?
My taxes going up under Obama is not the only reason that I'm not going to vote for him. It's merely high on a long list of reasons.
#8 Posted by Pianoman8869 on October 16, 2008 at 8:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Pianoman8869 -- You're right. I was generalizing. I was, and still am to some extent, in the financial industry. I owned a 300 person business in a large US city for 30 years. I based my comment on my experience. It's what most republicans do. If you don't fit the mold, sorry. The fact is the country is now controlled by the voters who are more and more in the middle and lower end, financially. They tend to be democrats and I don't see the trend reversing in the foreseeable future.
#9 Posted by thedudesview on October 16, 2008 at 8:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Let's start a pool to see who can guess where the DOW will bottom out between now and January 31. Anyone for 7,000?
#10 Posted by AARGGHHH on October 16, 2008 at 12:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Joe Biden said on a stump speech
There are three letters that Obama will bring to the American people and that is J-O-B-S (he said all 4 letters)
Three letters J-O-B-S and this guy has a 146 I.Q.
Funny.
#11 Posted by celtic99 on October 16, 2008 at 1:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
celtic...the ONLY thing McCain has going for him is his second wife's money, and Joe the plummer....oh but wait...wait....he's got Palin..hmmmm she offers NOTHING to the future of America.
So at least Biden offers a higher IQ and a family with more morals, too.
#12 Posted by beetlejuice on October 16, 2008 at 1:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Re: Post #19 - This probably isn't a good week for Democrats to start banging the "morals" drum again. Can anyone say "Congressman Mahoney"?
#13 Posted by Pianoman8869 on October 16, 2008 at 2:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I am really tired of Republicans versus Democrats. I am not 100% for Obama OR McCain and so I am not even voting...what a sad state this country is in right now. I wish we could all come together again the way we did during 911...I am sick of the backlashing against one another...sick of it all.
#14 Posted by dolphinfan on October 16, 2008 at 3:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
True, but not voting won't fix anything. If you don't vote than you really don't have a say. Hell, go vote and write in your dog or cat's name if need be...
#15 Posted by jim09091 on October 16, 2008 at 5:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
dolphinfan: There are other tickets on the ballot.
#16 Posted by flatbroke on October 16, 2008 at 9:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)