Home › News › Local news
Golden Gate Estates residents cry foul of county’s proposed solid waste park
More Local news
- Downtown Naples New Year’s Weekend Art Fair makes good investment in sluggish economy
- Collier Sheriff’s Office public affairs manager under internal investigation for behavior
- Experts worry plant used for biofuel is bad for environment
Tell us about it
- What would you add to this story? Tell us what we missed.
- Do you have photos from this event? Documents we need to see? Share with us.
- Upload photos & videos
- More ways to get your stuff online and in the paper.
STORY TOOLS
Share and Enjoy [?]
GOLDEN GATE ESTATES There are tough crowds.
And then there are Golden Gate Estates residents.
“We moved out there to the country for the peace and quiet,” said 11-year resident Marianne Longworth. “Now you’re going to put huge chippers and shredders and all kinds of things close to our homes.”
Longworth was among the more than 35 residents who attended a public information meeting Wednesday at the Golden Gate Community Center, aimed at getting initial public input and concerns on a proposed solid waste park project.
Collier County is seeking a conditional use permit to allow the development of a solid waste park on 341 acres of county-owned land, located approximately 1.5 miles east of Collier Boulevard and 1 mile north of White Lake Boulevard.
According to county documents, the park would provide land area for storm recovery operations, construction and demolition materials processing and biomass (horticulture debris) processing.
In addition, county officials said there would be the potential for the development of other needed operations such as administrative office space, educational facilities, bio-solids processing, and a recycling collections and materials recovery facility.
“This is the beginning of a very long process,” said Dan Rodriguez, Collier County’s solid waste director, during the more than hour-long presentation.
Along with exhibit boards showing the conceptual layout of the project, those attending the meeting were able to pick up maps and documents explaining what the future use of the facility could entail.
Residents’ concerns ranged from noise, flooding and environmental impact on endangered species, to the lack of buffer on parts of the proposed project and whether the project’s 27-acre retention pond would be lined to protect nearby water wells.
Because the project still needs to go before the Collier County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners, the fact that most residents would be unable to attend any of the subsequent county meetings on the issue — due to the meetings being held during regular business hours — also became a point of contention near the end of the meeting.
“A lot of these follow-up meetings are held while we are working,” said Longworth, who did not give her age. “We can’t get there. How can we possibly have any impact?”
Kay Deselem, with the county’s Department of Zoning and Land Development Review, told residents that she understood their dilemma, but that they had options.
“You do have the opportunity to submit written comments, concerns and questions,” said Deselem. “And I assure you that if you submit it to me, as part of that public file, it will go to the planning commission and it will go to the board... they (the boards) want to hear from you.”
After the meeting, Rodriguez said he wasn’t disheartened by the residents’ hesitance.
“As a whole, I think the community supports recycling and reuse facilities, but there are concerns about being a good neighbor,” Rodriguez said after the meeting. “We as government officials, it’s our job to answer all of those concerns.”
Rodriguez also urged residents to realize that the project is not finalized.
“This is conceptual,” said Rodriguez. “Through the vetted government process, it will be tweaked and modified.”
But residents weren’t impressed.
“I’m going to try to rally more people,” said Dale Barnhart, 63, who has lived in Golden Gate Estates for 10 years and had environmental impact concerns.
Fellow Estates resident Rick Haylock, 48, agreed and said neighbors would start placing calls to the local civic associations and other residents in the Estates right away.
“We’re going to inform them all, of exactly what’s been proposed,” said Haylock.








Comments
This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below. Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. Break our rules, and we will ban you. No exceptions, no second chances. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.
I agree with Marianne Longworth. I, too, moved out here seeking peace and quiet. Funny, they object to much-needed shopping centers out here, yet they are considering a monumental-sized dumpster right here in our beautiful Estates. It angers me that anything as obnoxious as this project sounds is even considered. NO WAY, NO HOW. I urge all Golden Gate Estatians to scream a loud "NO!"
#1 Posted by EstatesDweller on September 3, 2008 at 10:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I am NOT saying this is a good thing, I have a copy of the PDF someone sent me. I have info from the county too. But where should this type of facility go? Perhaps Haylock, might have an idea. What should be done with the debris? Should each homeowner rent or buy a chipper/shredder and disposed of this kind of waste on their own property?
(Don't think this is allowed now because of the risk for brush fire?)...
#2 Posted by BlueTonguedVole on September 3, 2008 at 10:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
HA! HA! HA! HA!
Beetle is laughing bcuz nobody really cares what people think in this sad situation.
GG Residents think they will listen, but it is a DOG AND PONY SHOW when all is said and done.
Beetle's all time pathetic moment from a public entity: "and I QUOTE...WE'RE not placing many chairs out here, Bcuz people can't sit down 2 tell us what they think......we want them in and out and GONE."
#3 Posted by beetlejuice on September 3, 2008 at 11:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
BTW....this ignorant quote came from Florida's D.O.T. on a new road proposed in Collier County just B 4 a public comment meeting.
So if residents think they can change this issue....I dunno...maybe they will B heard...but maybe not!
#4 Posted by beetlejuice on September 3, 2008 at 11:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Good luck Golden Gate Estates residents. The County Commissioners won't even remove the no parking signs from along CR 951 (Collier Blvd.) to allow Golden Gate Estates residents to use the boat ramp. I truly don't believe any of the Collier County Commissioners have our interests in mind. I am constantly disappointed by their decisions and tactics.
If they won't remove a no parking sign, what makes you think they will consider moving a solid waste dump? And if the Collier County School Board would start recycling some of those styro food trays, maybe they would need less space.
#5 Posted by ohyeah143 on September 3, 2008 at 11:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hey...ohyeah...run 4 Collier County Commissioner.
U C....it's about making a difference...not whining about it.
U R whining in Beetle's book.
Run 4 office 2 make a change.
Call the County....don't whine.
Whiners never win.
#6 Posted by beetlejuice on September 4, 2008 at 12:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)
She is worried about chippers and big equipment? What about the privately owned horticulutral waste removal company that is run out of a house that is right behind the dump. Also, all the equipment that is run out there taking care of the landscaping farms out there. I bet she doesn't noticed the landscaping crews going back to their offices that are also run out of homes in that neighborhood.
#7 Posted by Micheal_Hunt on September 4, 2008 at 1 a.m. (Suggest removal)
30 years ago it was called the "Golden Gate Folly", because of so much low ground. Somebody must have built the ground up, I don't know.
#8 Posted by rayroman on September 4, 2008 at 5:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Micheal...tell us more about the company.
I am not sure this area is even zoned GGE. Thought this area falls south of the Estates designation. Isn't it part of the industrially zoned area anyway? The dump is right there, too.
I know where this area is, but not about this company to which you refer.
rayoman, the canals drained much of the area of GGE. Homes have to be built to an elevation above the crown of the road and other regulations apply. Perhaps you should take a ride, much of the original GGE "fly over swampland" is actually nice. While there are still some low lying areas and roads which flood, delineated wetlands are reviewed by DEP to determine the buildable area in a lot. AND some of the Estates is now upland (shocking isn't it?) Yup, actually looks and feels just like dry pineland.
Take a ride out GG Blvd.: Dare to adventure east of 951! We don't bite.
#9 Posted by BlueTonguedVole on September 4, 2008 at 6:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
beetlejuice, FDOT is different than the county. The County will put out the chairs and even ask your opinion via surveys, etc. They will record it so you can see it even later on. Does that mean the public can have more influence on the County than FDOT? LOL. Sometimes, but not often.
The question is...where SHOULD this kind of operation go? If not where they want it (near the dump), then where. We will need it as more storms are coming our way.
Again, I am not sure I think this is a good idea, but should the debris go further north? South? East? NIMBY is an interesting phenomena. Do I want this in MY backyard. Heck no...but where else. Finding a better site than the County wants might just be the key to not allowing this! Happened with the new EOC...
#10 Posted by BlueTonguedVole on September 4, 2008 at 6:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Where is White Lake Blvd? I first thought it said White Blvd. and I was trying to figure THAT location out.
Where 'bouts we talking?
#11 Posted by eaglebeak on September 4, 2008 at 6:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)
White Lake Blvd. was formerly known as Landfill Road. It is just north of I-75 and runs to the current county landfill.
#12 Posted by Doctorate on September 4, 2008 at 7:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
PIEFACE: yep, you are right. The area is in North Belle Meade. I do believe that is is zoned for industrial use or the adjacent land is zoned that way. The drinking water wells in this area have naturally occurring high levels of chlorides (salt) which was deposited (as the sea level fell) before any humans touched the land.
eaglebeak: go to google maps: http://maps.google.com/
Just put in White Lake Blvd., Naples, Florida and you should get the picture. White Lake Blvd. curves to parallel Alligator Alley (aka I-75) and is just the other side (north) of it but well south of homes.
It is NOT in GGE as PIEFACE correctly said.
This is a very appropriate spot and mulching this debris is going to be like a big compost pile.
#13 Posted by BlueTonguedVole on September 4, 2008 at 8:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks BTV.
These articles are as confusing as the traffic report I heard one morning on the radio, of an accident at the intersection of Pine Ridge and Golden Gate Parkway!
#14 Posted by eaglebeak on September 4, 2008 at 9:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Why can't they put it under the powerlines somewhere between GoldenGate ParkWay & BonitaBeach RD
#15 Posted by GGunderwater on September 4, 2008 at 9:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Oh and the name of the company Michael Hunt was hinting at, I believe is Yahl Mulching and Recycling. This is a legitimate business with an occupational license.
#16 Posted by BlueTonguedVole on September 4, 2008 at 10:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Strap the waste to all the illegals ICE just rounded up for deportation. 2 birds, 1 stone.
#17 Posted by mangy_coon on September 4, 2008 at 11:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
PIEFACE: are you talking about chloride levels in the well water? Or, other pollutants...if so what has been found? What has DEP determined? I am curious what has been found which could be traced to decomposing yard waste...or are there other sources you suspect?
If you have another site which could be used, suggest it. It won't hurt. The challenge is that the named location is so close to where the WM trucks come now for the dump, so this might take some real activity to change the direction.
NaplesCracker, are there enough people to go to the CCPC from the area or have someone speak for them? Even sending emails may help because I believe that this group does look for input from the community. Also, the EAC hearing might be another venue to present your concerns. If someone has documentation of pollution, bring it.
#18 Posted by BlueTonguedVole on September 4, 2008 at 1:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Their opinions have no credence other than their age.
#19 Posted by orele on September 4, 2008 at 2:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The area for this proposed solid waste park falls just to the south of Hideout Golf Club, with Garland Road to the East and the canal to the West. They have lied at every point on the landfill, so we didnt expect them to be any different on this proposed 'waste park'.
The audience was well informed and asked probing questions that showed the dangerous unlined retention ponds that could potential poison our wells, the dumping of overflow into our canals, along with a real overall lack of planning and preparation in the plans by the county and its contractor PSJ&B who is putting forth the conceptual plans for the proposed solid waste park. They were wrong on almost everyone of their major assertions on how they were putting into the plans a safety net to protect the public from being negatively affected by the operation of the 'waste park'. This park is being pushed up 20 feet from resident, when before they were almost a half mile away, and that makes a big difference. In case of heavy rain, major storms or hurricanes, the buildup of the site would cause the heavy metals, paint, solvents leakage and runoff to go into the canal, go into unlined retention ponds which would spill unto the main well fields for Naples and poison them, and also go into the wells of the residents, flood all the neighboring lands which were high ground and never were flooded before as they will now be lower than the park. They had no controls planned for runoff for most of the park, the few retention ponds were 'unlined', no planning for flood control, no noise reduction or smell and odor control, and that is just the issues we discovered at the meeting, once its implement you can be sure other problems that were not foreseen will come up.
#20 Posted by napleswebmaker on September 4, 2008 at 3:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Napleswebmaker wrote: "In case of heavy rain, major storms or hurricanes, the buildup of the site would cause the heavy metals, paint, solvents leakage and runoff to go into the canal, go into unlined retention ponds which would spill unto the main well fields for Naples and poison them"<SNIP>
I am not defending the county here, napleswebmaker, but can you tell me (actually the rest of the bloggers too would probably like to know) how you know that this would happen? Do you have elevation maps to know that there would be flooding? Do you know that the materials indicated in the conceptual design would be left in a fashion which could make it dangerous? It sounds as if they did not have plans to make this material secure?
You can use county maps/FEMA maps to review to see if the area is prone to flooding. If it is, bring the map with you or a spokesperson to the CCPS and EAC, etc. If they had no plans to secure hazardous waste, DEP might be interested as well.
Conceptual plans are not SDPs, there is time to intervene. What kind of hazardous waste will be collected? Did they say anything about the "wonderful" (not) new "green" (not really) light bulbs full of mercury? Are the well fields significantly lower than the detention ponds?
The details will be important when you can present your findings to the other boards.
Can you share how the county lied about the landfill? Which department(s) lied?
If you gather this info, I would guess that would give you significant credibility before any board. I also think it might make a good investigative report which could be published in NDN.
#21 Posted by BlueTonguedVole on September 4, 2008 at 3:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The continual whining sound in Collier County
used to be from leaf blowers. Now its from
Golden Gate Residents. Buffer the project
and 99% of the people won't even know its there.
Oh well..let them all go have a nice cry with
Jim.
#22 Posted by BobBarricade on September 4, 2008 at 3:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
PS, you don't need to try to answer me...I would like to know what you found out, of course, but mostly, the info would be of benefit for your concerns.
#23 Posted by BlueTonguedVole on September 4, 2008 at 3:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Bob...Golden Gate (City) and Golden Gate Estates are different areas. AND the area in discussion is in neither area. As blogger PIEFACE and others pointed out. NDN got the headline wrong.
So seems you are volunteering to have the solid waste park moved to your neighborhood. I am sure the people of North Belle Meade will be delighted.
#24 Posted by BlueTonguedVole on September 4, 2008 at 3:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)
They admited at the meeting that "In case of heavy rain, major storms or hurricanes"
1) buildup of the site would cause the runoff of any of the heavy metals, paint, solvents.
2) The overflow in the retention ponds would go into the canal on the West side.
3)On the east side it go into unlined retention ponds which would spill unto the main well fields for Naples and into all the neighbors shallow wells.
I dont need elevation maps as they admited that since it is wetlands which at the moment have up to 2 feet water at the moment, they would have to fill and raise it substantially to the point the water would then flow towards the residents properties to the north and east.
As for securing the dangerous materials and chemicles, they implied it would sit in a dumpster type of container out in the open till processed.
The area is prone to flooding, at the moment the water is receding but the road was completely covered with water after Fay for days.
Yes, there are conceptual plans but they seemed to think its a done deal and so there might not be a point or time to intervene if they railroad this through. As for what kind of hazardous waste will be collected, they said the whole spectrum of hazardous waste that currently is done at the landfill would be moved to the park, so to me thats every kind you can imagine.
The South Regional Water plants has well fields right beside the proposed retention ponds, and they are not allowed to do this per code as you cannot have a landfill and well fields in the same section, so thus they are calling it a 'waste park' which gives them a loophole.
The county lied about the landfill when Waste Management officials said in the Commissioners meeting that the cells would close in 24-30 months when the cells fill up. But that was just a scam when they were pushing the incinerator waste to power concept.
#25 Posted by napleswebmaker on September 4, 2008 at 6:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Put your questions up and I will check up with my sources and info and post it, and here is a some interesting info/links on the contractor that did the plans and was bringing this for approval of a ‘Conditional Use'.
PBS&J stands for Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. (also a stock symbol)
BREAKING NEWS: PBS&J Overcharged States by Tens of Millions and PBS&J working with Austin Chamber of Commerce to hoodwink press.
Former PBS&J Chairman Richard A. Wickett set to be sentenced .....Government court filings cite other illegal campaign contributions by PBS&J executives......
http://www.citizensforethics.org/node...
A second former chairman of engineering-consulting firm PBS&J pleaded guilty ..to charges involving a long-running scheme to use campaign contributions to win government contracts.
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-16968...
PBS&J also was recently banned from seeking new contracts with the Texas Department of Transportation, until it paid a multimillion-dollar settlement stemming from overcharges in state projects.
http://corridornews.blogspot.com/2006...
Rocked by a $36-million embezzlement scheme, PBS&J finds the same corporate culture that got it into trouble.....
http://www.allbusiness.com/crime-law/...
http://www.floridatrend.com/article.a...
PBS&J Hid Millions in Overcharges
http://salcostello.blogspot.com/2007/...
#26 Posted by napleswebmaker on September 4, 2008 at 6:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Oh, its less than 1000 yards from Golden Gates Estates as the crow flies, so 6 or half a dozen its all the same, and its right by the well fields for Naples so that could affect many residents water source.
#27 Posted by napleswebmaker on September 4, 2008 at 6:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
That is 9 Collier County water supply wells that are shown as "developed", but the 'well fields' are not at the wells itself but underneath them and all around. So it pulls the water from a much larger footprint than just the well, and if they are going to put the 'waste park' right beside the well fields its not for a few days, weeks or months. We are talking years and years with those toxins, solvents, and other unknown chemicals leaching right through the unlined retention ponds, and overflowing with the storm water and any flooding. So there is the potential of longterm affects on the scale of that movie, with Julia Roberts, I cant remember the name about the poisoning of the towns water supply.
#28 Posted by napleswebmaker on September 4, 2008 at 9:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hope you can go to the CCPC meeting and EAC meeting napleswebmaker you have done a great job researching this. I also got to read the Collier Citizen and both Kaytee and Russell Tuff have articles.
Thanks for your attentiveness.
I agree with NaplesCracker if it was just horticultural debris, it should pose no problems.
NDN you need to do a big deal investigation on this one! If wells for the county and water plant could be affected, then, it isn't a NIMBY issue at all. Time to do one of your investigative specials on this entire situation!
#29 Posted by BlueTonguedVole on September 4, 2008 at 10:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Napleswebmaker, I think you would be an excellent reporter. I reread your info and was very impressed by your efforts and depth of information.
Thank you very much.
BTV
#30 Posted by BlueTonguedVole on September 5, 2008 at 9:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)