User profile: maverick1
Joined: Jan. 26, 2008
Comments posted: 27
Contact maverick1 (log-in required)
Comments by maverick1
Page 1 of 3 | Next
Posted on December 14 at 11:34 a.m.
looks like the collier commissioners have no new ideas so we need another new association to tell us what we need. and will the commissioners agree?
can you teach an old dog new tricks? tough times need new ideas and tough decisions. doubt the old guard has the gumption to be progressive.
On Project Innovation: Collier's economic leaders encouraging change
Posted on December 13 at 12:51 p.m.
HERE WE GO
NO ONE CARES WE ARE PAYING 13K AN ACRE FOR PEPPER RANCH WHILE THE STATE PAYS 7.5 K FOR US. SUGAR LAND. AND 1000 ACRES IN PEPPER RANCH ARE ALREADY LOCKED UP AS CONSERVATION LAND SO WE PAY TWICE,
THE CONSERVANCY HAS THEIR GROUPS OF PEOPLE THAT ARE MAKING TONS OF MONEY OVER AND OVER AGAIN, SOMEONE NEEDS TO DO A FLOW CHART AND FOLLOW THE MONEY OF WHO GETS WHAT.
Posted on December 8 at 2:45 p.m.
hey nick,
i said the local gov't should be managed like a business and they basically did not want to hear it. politicians want to be political not efficient or practical. why do you think they are in politics?
Posted on December 8 at 2:33 p.m.
way to stand up and take a side for your district
coletta. waste more time politicing and more form pushing for collier staff. no wonder nothing gets done.
Posted on December 3 at 10:08 a.m.
wow. lets see pay a tax for conservation collier to pick up property then pay again for panther rights. again coletta is right. forget about those private mitigation companies that shuffle and take money in the name of conservation. they take money for their own greed, just like an enron exec. we should pay nothing. considering we already over paid for pepper ranch by about 13 million why should the taxpayer pay any more. us sugar got 7,500 an acre. pepper ranch cost 13,500 an acre . no lets refigure because 985 of those acres were already locked up as undevelopable land so we really paid 21,000 an acre so 3 times what the state is paying for US sugar. allen and taylor can hi five all the way to the bank. the tax payers of collier will wake up some day and watch out.
Posted on December 3 at 9:48 a.m.
coletta got it right. keep the locals employed, (wonder where that came from, i'm sure the lack of competition in his re-election bid had nothing to do with it) i digress
hey how about we sell advertising rights to allow businesses to maintain the medians. I mean with nice carved rich looking wood signs that says who maintains the area and plugs the business. just like keeping roads clear by some businesses.
On Collier commissioners discuss how to use dwindling landscaping funds
Posted on December 1 at 12:35 p.m.
look at reagan economics
reduce the impact fees to recieve more in impact fees. it will work.
the old gaurd is asleep at the wheel.
On Collier commissioners put impact fee problem in hands of county’s Productivity Committee
Posted on December 1 at 11:38 a.m.
let's look at our commisioner "speak" at work.
coletta says " I have not seen the new ordinance but do not think it is enforceable". DUH?
further he states “It raises a problem,” Coletta said, adding that making an activity illegal without offering legal alternatives doesn’t really make sense.
what is the legal alternative to stealing , or cocaine, or running red lights.
holy cow batman! the nuts are running the asylum
On Collier commission to consider ordinance to curb homeless camping
Posted on November 29 at 1:02 p.m.
so i am not the only one to see sherrifs cars turn lights on and off to get to an unknown non -emergency. what about on the east trail that kid that got hit on the bike by a deputy. when will the truth come out on that?
Page 1 of 3 | Next
Posted on January 6 at 7:40 p.m.
again no comments on the future.
no one cares that the greenies will never be happy.
On Citizens committee approves plan for growth in rural Collier County